The Chaotic-Neutron

U.N. calls for nuclear disarmament

by Vijay on Sep.24, 2009, under Defense, News, Nuclear

Finally, someone said it out loud and is getting everyone riled up on the idea of a world without nuclear weapons. Here’s the article. This is one of those things that might alleviate a lot of concerns for people in the proliferation policy realm but I think it is ineffective and serves a moot point on giving us a false sense of security that the world is safer, even if all the nukes are disarmed.

Why you ask ? Because we are humans. And unlearning physics that is a simple extension of a much more helpful application, i.e., the generation of power from reactors, is quite hard. In fact to quote from the article,

Chinese President Hu Jintao made clear that Beijing had no plans to scrap its nuclear arsenal.

“We will continue to keep our nuclear capabilities at the minimum level required for national security, and make efforts to advance the international disarmament process,” Hu said.

If every country that already has nukes takes a similar stance, and by suggesting arbitrarily that “we will keep our nuclear capabilities at the minimum level required for national security”, there is still reason for countries that want to get in to building nukes to get a nuclear status and respect from fear. And yes, I’m talking about North Korea, Iran and may be Brazil specifically.

But we strive, and that is probably a good thing. At least, we are heading in the right direction…

Related posts:

  1. A.Q. Khan on Pakistan’s Nuclear Program I just came across a very interesting and revealing interview...
  2. China moving forward with AP1000 reactors This is good news. I know that the NRC in...
  3. Radiation. Is it a paranoia ? Being a nuclear engineer by profession, it takes a lot...

:, ,

blog comments powered by Disqus

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:

Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!

 

Archives

All entries, chronologically...